home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0
/
Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO
/
tezcat
/
New_World_Order
/
The_United_Nations.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-07-08
|
6KB
|
113 lines
From the Radio Free Michigan archives
ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot
If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu.
------------------------------------------------
THE UNITED NATIONS
------------------
The United Nations has set itself up to become the single most
powerful organization on the planet. It already gets the Western Nations
to jump when it says. How many people have been sent to Somalia (in
vain) or to Boznia-Herzegovinia (again in vain) at the bidding of the
UN? This doesn't even factor in the massive effort put into "Operation
Desert Storm".
Let us consider the _Univeral_Declaration_of_Human_Rights_ which
on December 10th 1948 gave the UN unlimited power to do whatever it
wishes regardless of what anyone may say to the contrary. All member
nations have adopted this document as "law" and their continued
committment to the UN only further reinforces their role in the UN's
totalitarian scheme.
Article 26 paragraph 2 ends, "and shall further the activities of
the United Nations for the maintenance of peace." This is crucial when
we consider that Article 26 has specifically to do with education. The
leap from education to media or information is very small. They might
just as well have changed the Article to read:
(1) Everyone has the right to education. <given that we agree
with what is being taught> Education <Indoctrination> shall be free, at
least in the elementary and fundamental stages. <Until we have our claws
dug real deep> Elementary education shall be compulsory. <Mandatory
indoctrination> Technical and professional education...
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the
human personality <so that your morals and ethics match what we have in
store for you and your kind> and to the strengthening of repect for
human rights and fundamental freedoms. <and to the strengthening of
respect for our domination of you> It shall promote understanding,
tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups,
<destroy any sense of national identity> and shall further the activities
of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education
that shall be given to their children. <Our kind of 'education' or our
kind of 'indoctrination'>
This is not to say that on the surface it all sounds very good.
The point here is that the United Nations gives itself all the decision
making power. Consider Article 28:
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which
the rights and freedoms set forth in the Declaration can be fully realized.
Now turn to Article 29 subsection 3
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised
contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
This makes the UN the only interpreter of its goals and
'principles'. So if your freedoms and rights allow you to do anything
which the UN does not approve of, then you end up in violation of
'international law' or you end up committing a 'crime against humanity',
much like I'm doing in writing this critique.
Article 30 clarifies the UN's position.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for
any State, group or individual any right to engage in any activity or to
perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and
freedoms set forth herein.
In other words, nobody may question the UN or contest its 'right'
to world dictatorship. Had Hitler won WWII, at least we would know where
we stand; but I'm not so sure I know where we stand with the UN.
It hardly seems questionable that the UN gave itself the power to
pursue legal action against anyone, anywhere, for any reason. The fact
remains that the _Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights_ gave the UN the
authority to determine whatever it wishes to be law. The UN gets to
interpret its own agenda and purpose. What happens when that purpose
seems to no longer be legitimate? What happens when the UN becomes the
sovereign one world government it intends to be?
(I apologize for the less than academic format. I just don't have the
time to prepare a better argument. I hope the message is clear and
somewhat concise. I do not wish to downplay human rights here, only to
point out that the UN has used this forum to legitimize whatever purpose
it feels at the time. Consider Iraq with an open mind. Why was the UN
iinvolved? Crimes against Humanity? or was it that some of the more
influential countries in the UN stood to loose a considerable amount of
money from Iraqi annexation of a small oil rich country. Certainly it
wasn't anything to do with 'crimes against humanity'. If it was, why
didn't they invade Cambodia when Pol Pot exterminated 2 million of his
own people? Why does the UN not interfere in the extermination of the
Chiapas Indians in Mexico? Just wondering about some of these things.
Think happy thoughts and... if they can't get you hooked on heroin...
they can get you hooked on television...)
------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan archives by the archive maintainer.
All files are ZIP archives for fast download.
E-mail bj496@Cleveland.Freenet.Edu)